Gurule v. Apker
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Gurule
Respondent: Craig Apker
Case Number: 4:2013cv00720
Filed: July 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: D Thomas Ferraro (PS)
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER as follows: Magistrate Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation ( 20 ) is accepted and adopted. Petitioner's §2241 Petition ( 1 ) is denied. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/1/2016. (SIB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gurule v. Apker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Gurule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Apker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?