United States of America v. Perrow et al
United States of America |
Therese A Perrow, Arizona Department of Revenue, Trust Company of America and Branch Banking & Trust Company |
4:2013cv00769 |
August 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
David C Bury |
Bernardo P Velasco |
Federal Tax Suits: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Velasco's 37 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment against Perrow be entered for her outstanding federal income tax liabilities for the years 1995, and 2000 through 2006, less any additional credits according to proof, plus interest and othe r statutory additions from 4/8/13. The United States is entitled to foreclose its valid federal tax liens on the Subject Property, commonly known as 14120 N. Skyhawk Drive, Tucson, Arizona 85755. This action is terminated. 37 Report and Recommendation, 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by United States of America. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 2/2/15.(BAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.