Shupe et al v. Cricket Communications Incorporated
||Cricket Communications Incorporated
||August 29, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Tucson Division Office
||Cindy K Jorgenson
||Bernardo P Velasco
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1441
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 10, 2014
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Ordered Magistrate Judge Markovich's 39 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Markovich to address any post-judgment motions. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 12/10/2014.(BAR)
|January 14, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered the 22 Report and Recommendation is adopted. It is further Ordered the 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction / Motion to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration is denied as moot, Th e Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 5 and 12 ) are denied, the Motion to Amend or Correct the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 ) is denied, and the Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 13 ) is granted with leave to amend. It is further Ordered Plaintif f shall have 30 days from the date of filing this Order to file a Third Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a judgment of dismissal, without prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file a Third Amended Complaint within 30 days of the filing date of this Order (see attached PDF for more information). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/13/2014. (MFR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?