Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
| Dale Frank Maisano |
| Eric H Holder, Tresa Schroeder, Unknown Schmidt, G Pacheco, Matthew Harvey, Rich Unger, John Modrzejewski, Corizon Health Incorporated, Charles Ryan, Angela Martinez, Ricky Rojas and J Zevallos |
| 4:2013cv01118 |
| September 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER: The application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is therefore GRANTED. In accordance with the PLRA, the plaintiff is hereby assessed the full $350 filing fee. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED send a copy of this order to the Warden of t he Arizona State Prison. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tucson Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This Court has not conducted an initial revie w of the plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) or § 1915A. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/10/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail; Warden of Arizona State Prison)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) [Transferred from tnmd on 9/11/2013.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
