Washington v. Ryan et al
| Hubert Washington, Jr. |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2013cv01317 |
| October 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Bernardo P Velasco (PS) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER Petitioner's Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED with prejudice. A Certificate of Appeability is DENIED and shall not issue. Petitioner's Motion Requesting Release from Prison Pending the C ourt's Ruling (Doc. 21 ) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and to close the file in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 5/24/2016. (See attached PDF for complete information)(DLC)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER, Ground One (b) and Grounds Two and Three are dismissed. Respondents shall file a supplemental answer, addressing Ground One (a) and (c), within thirty days of the filing date of this order. Petitioner may file a supplemental reply within thir ty days from the date of service of the supplemental answer addressing Ground One (a) and (c) only. The Court will take the matter under advisement upon receipt of the supplemental briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 1/21/15. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
