Ibarra et al v. Kennedy Funding Incorporated et al
Margot Padres Elias, Luis Carlos Sanchez Gayou, Kristy Anne Shannon, Alberto Martin Sanchez Gayou, Martha Gayou Matiella and Alberto Sanchez Ibarra |
Lilia Lizeth Corrales, Ramon Alberto Fuentes, Fuentes Gomez and Associates LLC, Kennedy Funding Incorporated, Efrain Corrales, Cecilia Corrales, Jose Martin Fuentes and Unknown Fuentes |
4:2013cv02371 |
December 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
Jennifer G Zipps |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 52 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 45 Motion to Seal Document and 44 Motion for Attorney Fees are denied and all outstanding motions are denied as moot. The clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/26/2014. (BAR) |
Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court enter an order denying the 45 MOTION to Seal Document and plaintiffs' 44 MOTION for Attorney Fees. All outstanding motions should be denied as moot and the Clerk of the Court should be instructed to close the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 9/2/2014. (BAR) |
Filing 43 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 42 Report and Recommendation; granting 13 Motion to Remand to State Court. This case remains referred to the Honorable Leslie A. Bowman for all pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/16/2014.(BAR) |
Filing 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, enter an order GRANTING the amended 13 motion to remand, filed by the plaintiffs on 1/22/14. If the action is remanded, the court may retain jurisdiction to permit the p laintiffs an opportunity to file a separate motion for attorneys fees and costs. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, the par tys right to de novo review may be waived. The Local Rules permit the filing of a response to an objection. They do not permit the filing of a reply to a response. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 5/12/14.(BAC) |
Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is Ordered that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23 ) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. It is further Ordered that Defendant Kennedy Funding Inc .'s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default (Doc. 7 ) is GRANTED. It is further Ordered Defendant KFI shall file its Answer, or otherwise respond, within 7 days of the filing of this Order and that Defendant KFI shall file its Response to the Amended Motion to Remand (Doc. 13 ) within 14 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 2/26/2014. (MFR) |
Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 7 MOTION to Vacate Entry of Default filed by Kennedy Funding Incorporated. The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court enter an order GRANTING the motion to set aside entry of default(Doc. 7 ), a nd grants Kennedy Funding 20 days within which to file an Answer and a response to the pending motion to remand (Doc. 13 ). Written objections due within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 2/4/14. (SMBE) Modified to reflect written opinion on 2/4/2014 (SMBE). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.