Finney v. Winn

Petitioner: Maurice Finney
Respondent: Louis W Winn, Jr.
Case Number: 4:2014cv02029
Filed: April 17, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Bernardo P Velasco (PS)
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2015 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Velasco's 23 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS ORDERED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in favor of Defendant. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/30/15.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Finney v. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maurice Finney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louis W Winn, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?