Rose v. Sierra Vista, City of et al
| Phillip Rose |
| Sierra Vista, City of, Starr Lynn Seesler, Daryl L Copp, Lori Burdick, Laura Cardinal and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2014cv02240 |
| July 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles R Pyle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDERED adopting Report and Recommendations re 44 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motions are granted: 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 26 Motion to Dismiss Party; 35 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 11/3/2015.(BAR)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Vacating Order to Show Cause Hearing previously set by the Clerk's Office (Doc. 20). As this case is assigned to this Court and has already been referred back to Magistrate Judge Pyle after a party objected to Magistrate Judge jurisdicti on (see Docs. 23, 24, 25), any such election form would be moot in any event. The hearing set by the Clerks Office is VACATED. If the issue was not moot, the Court would set a new deadline to file an election, and if it was not received by the deadline, the case would likely be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff.. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 11/26/14. (JAS, kr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
