Rose v. Sierra Vista, City of et al

Plaintiff: Phillip Rose
Defendant: Sierra Vista, City of, Starr Lynn Seesler, Daryl L Copp, Lori Burdick, Laura Cardinal and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2014cv02240
Filed: July 22, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Charles R Pyle
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 5, 2015 56 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED adopting Report and Recommendations re 44 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motions are granted: 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 26 Motion to Dismiss Party; 35 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 11/3/2015.(BAR)
November 26, 2014 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Vacating Order to Show Cause Hearing previously set by the Clerk's Office (Doc. 20). As this case is assigned to this Court and has already been referred back to Magistrate Judge Pyle after a party objected to Magistrate Judge jurisdicti on (see Docs. 23, 24, 25), any such election form would be moot in any event. The hearing set by the Clerks Office is VACATED. If the issue was not moot, the Court would set a new deadline to file an election, and if it was not received by the deadline, the case would likely be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff.. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 11/26/14. (JAS, kr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose v. Sierra Vista, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Rose
Represented By: Elvin Garry Grundy, III(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sierra Vista, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starr Lynn Seesler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daryl L Copp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Burdick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura Cardinal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?