Moore v. Winn
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 17, 2017
ORDER accepting and adopting in full 15 Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation. It is further ordered that J.T. Shartle, Warden, is substituted as Respondent for Louis Winn. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 7/17/2017. (SIB)
|May 18, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Substituting J.T. Shartle, Warden, as Respondent for "Louis Winn" pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 43(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; and Dismissing the P etition (Doc. [1)] under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction. Any party may serve and file written objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to another part y's objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy. No replies shall be filed unless leave is granted from the District Court. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-14-2379-TUC-RM. Failure to file timely objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge may result in waiver of the right of review. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Report and Recommendation to all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 5/18/2017. (SIB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?