Genao v. Winn

Petitioner: Ismael Genao
Respondent: Louis W Winn, Jr.
Case Number: 4:2014cv02402
Filed: October 6, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman (PS)
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 13, 2015 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. It is further Ordered that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 19 ) in GRANTED. It is further Ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED as moot and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 8/12/2015. (MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Genao v. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ismael Genao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louis W Winn, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?