Russell v. Flores et al

Plaintiff: Simon Russell
Defendant: Mauricio Alberto Flores, Unknown Flores, Werner Enterprises Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2014cv02474
Filed: November 13, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Eric J Markovich
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 16, 2016 95 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 88 ) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 55 ) is granted. All future filings shall be made in Russell v. Werner Enterprises, CV 14- 02474-TUC-RM(EJM). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter will continue to be referred to Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/12/2016. (See Attached Order for Complete Details) (Associated Cases: 4:14-cv-02474-RM-EJM, 4:16-cv-00088-RM) (SIB)
July 20, 2016 88 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court GRANT Plaintiff's 55 Motion to Consolidate CV-00088-TUC-RM with CV-02474-TUC-RM(EJM). Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. No reply to any response shall be filed. If objections are not timely filed, then the parties' rights to de novo review by the District Court may be deemed waived. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-14-02474-TUC-RM(EJM). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 7/20/16.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Russell v. Flores et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Simon Russell
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Schmidt(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mauricio Alberto Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Werner Enterprises Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?