Russell v. Flores et al
| Simon Russell |
| Mauricio Alberto Flores, Unknown Flores, Werner Enterprises Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2014cv02474 |
| November 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Eric J Markovich |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 118 ) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Werner's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re: Punitive Damages and Negligent Hiring (Doc. 56 ) is granted in part and de nied in part as follows: the Motion is granted as to Plaintiff's negligent hiring claim and denied as to Plaintiff's punitive damages claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Werners Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re: Negligent Hiring (Doc. 74 ) is granted. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 2/9/2017. (See attached PDF for complete information)(DLC)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 88 ) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 55 ) is granted. All future filings shall be made in Russell v. Werner Enterprises, CV 14- 02474-TUC-RM(EJM). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter will continue to be referred to Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/12/2016. (See Attached Order for Complete Details) (Associated Cases: 4:14-cv-02474-RM-EJM, 4:16-cv-00088-RM) (SIB)
|
|
Filing
88
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court GRANT Plaintiff's 55 Motion to Consolidate CV-00088-TUC-RM with CV-02474-TUC-RM(EJM). Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. No reply to any response shall be filed. If objections are not timely filed, then the parties' rights to de novo review by the District Court may be deemed waived. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-14-02474-TUC-RM(EJM). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 7/20/16.(BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
