Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Muscular Dystrophy Association Incorporated
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Muscular Dystrophy Association Incorporated |
| 4:2014mc00011 |
| December 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Muscular Dystrophy Association Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Muscular Dystrophy Association Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Hillary K Valderrama |
| Represented By: | Mark Jacob Sorokin |
| Represented By: | Mary Joleen O'Neill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
