Rodriguez-Vega v. USA

Petitioner: Edilberto Rodriguez-Vega
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2015cv00164
Filed: April 17, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Presiding Judge: Bernardo P Velasco
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 15, 2015 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, Movant's Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1 in CV 15-164-TUC-BPV and Doc. 4 in 14-24387-PO-BPV) is DENIED and the civil action opened in connection with that motion is DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 12/11/15. (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez-Vega v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Christopher James Lewis(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edilberto Rodriguez-Vega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?