Nixon v. Stiness et al
| Tony Nixon |
| William Stiness, Daniel Guzman, Henry Lopez, Tony Rowe, John S Leonardo, Ricardo Novoa and Brian R Decker |
| 4:2015cv00277 |
| June 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Charles R Pyle |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's 38 "Motion for Another Conference Hearing on Understand and Clarification of Static Conference Hearing on Evident" is DENIED. The 37 Report and Recommendation is a dopted. Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED. The action is terminated with prejudice as to the claims against Leonardo and Decker discussed in the Report and Recommendation and without prejudice on all other claims. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court is directed to accept no further filings in this matter except in connection with an appeal. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/9/16. (BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
