Granados # 280949 v. Arizona, State of
Petitioner: Crispin Granados
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Case Number: 4:2015cv00492
Filed: October 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: Eric J Markovich (PS)
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Petitioner's Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 110 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall docket accordingly and close the case file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 9/11/19. (KAH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Granados # 280949 v. Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Crispin Granados
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?