Valencia v. Maxwell et al
Alberto Arellano Valencia |
Brandon Maxwell, Travis Napier, Tucson Police Department and Tucson, City of |
4:2015cv00499 |
October 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
David C Bury |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter JUDGMENT for Defendants and against Plaintiff, nunc pro tunc. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 12/18/19. (MYE) |
Filing 76 ORDER : that within 24 hours of the filing date of this Order, the Plaintiff's attorney shall file a Notice to Show Cause that contact with the Plaintiff has been reestablished, and he is ready to proceed with the pretrial conference. IT IS FURT HER ORDERED that in the event the Plaintiff has not reestablished contact with his attorney and is not ready to proceed with the pretrial conference, the Court shall vacate the pretrial conference and dismiss the case, with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 9/6/2019. (MCO) |
Filing 70 ORDER that the Defendants are granted summary judgment on the policy claim against the City of Tucson; the City of Tucson is dismissed from this action. It is further Ordered that 30 days from the filing date of this Order, the parties shall file the Joint Pretrial Order (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/19/2019. (MFR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.