Otero v. Johnson et al
| Carmen Figueroa Otero |
| Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez, Julie Hashimoto and Al Gallmann |
| 4:2016cv00090 |
| February 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 49 Motion for Leave to Take Discovery; granting 50 Motion to Supplement Administrative Record; granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Extension of Time and for Status Conference. Discovery shall be completed within 45 days of the date of the Court's Order on the Motion to Dismiss. The Oteros shall file their dispositive motion on or before October 27, 2017. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 7/18/2017. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.)(BAR)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDERED: The Court's previous Order granting in part the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order is confirmed. Paragraph 2 of the Court's October 27, 2016, Order is amended. The 30 MOTION to Continue He aring on Preliminary Injunction is granted. The Preliminary Injunction Hearing is continued to December 1, 2016 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cindy K Jorgenson. The 18 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is granted; the 17 First MOTION to Dismiss Case is denied. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 11/2/2016. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.)(BAR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
