Tillery v. Shartle

Petitioner: David Tillery
Respondent: JT Shartle
Case Number: 4:2016cv00204
Filed: April 11, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman (PS)
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 14, 2016 42 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's 37 motion, filed on 11/14/16, to vacate the court's order sealing the administrative record is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's 38 motion, filed on the same date, for "stay of judgment" is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 12/14/16.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tillery v. Shartle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Tillery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JT Shartle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?