Strouse v. Santana, et. al
Petitioner: James Brandon Strouse
Respondent: Joe Santana and Unknown Party
Case Number: 4:2016cv00237
Filed: April 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Eric J Markovich (PS)
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered Magistrate Judge Markovich's R&R (Doc. 47 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. It is further Ordered the case caption in this matter i s AMENDED as shown above, terminating "Joe Santana" and "John Doe" as respondents and reflecting that J.T. Shartle is the only Respondent. It is further Ordered DISMISSING the Petition (Doc. 34 ) for lack of jurisdiction. It is further Ordered DENYING AS MOOT Petitioner's Petition for Leave to Order Bureau of Prisons to File and Process Administrative Remedies (Doc. 39 ). It is further Ordered DENYING AS MOOT Petitioner's Petition to Expedite Summary Judgement (Doc. 44 ). The Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 6/26/2017. (MFR)
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Judge enter an order AMENDING the case caption to terminate "Joe Santana" and "John Doe" as respondents; DISMISSING the Petition (Doc. 34 ) for lack of jurisdiction; DENYING Petitioner's Petition for Leave to Order Bureau of Prisons to File and Process Administrative Remedies (Doc. 39 ) as moot; and DENYING Petitioner's Petition to Expedite for a Summary of Judgment (Doc. 44 ) as moo t. Any party may serve and file written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-16-237-TUC-RCC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 5/19/2017. (See attached pdf for details) (DPS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strouse v. Santana, et. al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Brandon Strouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joe Santana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?