Havlick v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Christopher James Havlick
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 4:2016cv00284
Filed: May 18, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Lynnette C Kimmins
Presiding Judge: James A Soto
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 14, 2017 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 28 . This case is remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings as discussed in the Report and Recommendation.The Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 7/13/17. (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Havlick v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher James Havlick
Represented By: Nancy J Meserow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By: John Christopher LaMont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?