McBride v. Ryan

Petitioner: Dewey Lee McBride
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Case Number: 4:2016cv00485
Filed: July 21, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Maricopa
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 26, 2017 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 19 . The Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue in this case. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/26/17. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McBride v. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dewey Lee McBride
Represented By: Natman Schaye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Represented By: Tanja Karin Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?