Roman-Lizarraga v. Ryan et al
| Florencio Roman-Lizarraga |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2016cv00656 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Leslie A Bowman (PS) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the opinion of the Court. Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment accordingly. In the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 8/14/17.(BAC)
|
|
Filing
31
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Florencio Roman-Lizarraga. Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, enter an order DISMISSING the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is tim e-barred. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. Local Rules permit a response to an objection; they do not permit a reply to a response without the permission of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 6/26/17.(BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
