Stith v. Arizona, State of et al
| Toney Eugene Stith |
| Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2016cv00794 |
| December 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Leslie A Bowman (PS) |
| David C Bury |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Amended Petition (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED. In the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable as to Claims One, Two, and Four. The Court issues a certificate of appealability as to Claim Three. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 1/22/2018. (See attached Order for details) (KEP)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 10 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court enter an order Denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Claim (3) shouldbe denied on the meri ts. Claims (1), (2), and (4) are procedurally defaulted. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 10/2/17. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
