Rudisill v. Ryan et al
| Stephen Louis Rudisill |
| Charles L Ryan, Tamara Porter, Lisa Lyon, Kataushia Thomas, Cindy Black, Shelley Wilson-Howard, Corizon Incorporated, Vanessa Headstream, Christine Armenta, Andrea Roberts, Beverly Webber and Itoro Elijah |
| 4:2017cv00033 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
ORDER GRANTING: 164 Motion for Clarification of Court Order by Stephen Louis Rudisill. The Court's previously scheduled 6/12/20 settlement conference has been postponed. Upon rescheduling of the settlement conference, the Court will issue an O rder which sets forth the new settlement conference date, time, and location. Plaintiff and the Arizona Department of Corrections will receive timely notice of the Order. The Court's 4/21/20 Order extending the deadline for the parties to file a proposed pretrial statement/order remains in effect. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 6/18/20.(BAC)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER GRANTING 109 Motion for Extension of Time Deadline. Defendants have until 3/28/19 for Defendant Ryan to respond to Plaintiff's Second Set of Requests for Production dated 2/8/19. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/19/19. (BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
