Soucy v. Ryan et al
Ryan Starr Soucy |
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
4:2017cv00110 |
March 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pinal |
Leslie A Bowman (PS) |
David C Bury |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's 28 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. Further ordered that the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Petition is DISMISSED. Further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment accordingly. Further ordered that in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court dec lines to issue a certificate of appealability, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 8/31/2017. (BAR) |
Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court enter an order dismissing the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and denying the 3 MOTION for a Stay. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (b), any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 7/13/2017. (BAR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.