Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Kelly et al
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Raul Grijalva
Defendant: John F Kelly, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K McAleenan and United States Customs and Border Protection
Case Number: 4:2017cv00163
Filed: April 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED the 50 Motion to Complete the Administrative Record; Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record with Extra-Record Evidence; and Request for Judicial Notice ("Motion") is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is DENIED AS MOOT as to documents previously disclosed or included in the Administrative Record and DENIED as to documents that do not exist. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/16/20. (BAC)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER that Defendants' partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22 ) is DENIED (in-part) and GRANTED (in-part). Only Plaintiffs claim pursuant to section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 10/31/2018. (See attached Order for details) (KEP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Kelly et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Represented By: Brendan Ridgely Cummings
Represented By: Brian Segee
Represented By: Anchun Jean Su
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raul Grijalva
Represented By: Brendan Ridgely Cummings
Represented By: Brian Segee
Represented By: Anchun Jean Su
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John F Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin K McAleenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?