Vanaman v. Molinar et al
| Leslie Grey Vanaman |
| Unknown Molinar and JT Shartle |
| 4:2017cv00222 |
| May 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 177 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. This case is to remain closed. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 3/21/23. (BAC)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDERED that: Plaintiff's 108 Motion to Rule on Admissions or, alternatively, Motion for Extension of Time is granted as to Plaintiffs request to extend discovery deadlines and denied as to Plaintiffs motion to deem his requests for admis sion admitted. Plaintiff's 126 Motion for Leave to File Late Reply to Doc. 116 is granted. Plaintiff's 112 Second Motion Regarding the Sufficiency of Admissions is granted as to Request No. 1, but denied as to the remaining requests. Plaintiff's 114 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions and 115 Motion to Assign Court Resources are denied. It is further ordered that the discovery deadline is extended for 60 days from the date of this order and the deadline for dispositive motions is extended to 30 days from the close of discovery. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 12/9/2019. (BAR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
