Martin v. Unknown Party

Martin v. Unknown Party

Petitioner:	Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:	Unknown Party
Case Number:	4:2017cv00371
Filed:	July 31, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline M Rateau
Presiding Judge:	Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 29, 2019	Filing 43 ORDERED that the 31 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Petitioner's 32 Objection is overruled. It is further ordered that Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fur ther ordered that 27 Petitioner's Motion for Declaratory Judgment is denied. It is further ordered that 26 Petitioner's Request for Clarification and 34 , 41 Motions to Expedite are denied. Ordered that 35 Petitioner's Motion to add Respondent is denied as moot. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 1/25/2019. (BAR)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 29, 2019

Filing 43 ORDERED that the 31 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Petitioner's 32 Objection is overruled. It is further ordered that Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fur ther ordered that 27 Petitioner's Motion for Declaratory Judgment is denied. It is further ordered that 26 Petitioner's Request for Clarification and 34 , 41 Motions to Expedite are denied. Ordered that 35 Petitioner's Motion to add Respondent is denied as moot. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 1/25/2019. (BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Unknown Party
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Adam Eugene Martin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Party
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?