Briggs v. Ryan et al
| Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| Troy Jack Briggs |
| 4:2018cv00031 |
| January 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Yuma |
| Eric J Markovich |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED and Troy Jack Briggs's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC § 2254 is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall docket accordingly and close the case file in this matter. Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 8/21/20.(BAC)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge hereby RECOMMENDS that the District Court dismiss this action for failure to prosecute, failure to notify the Court of address change, and failure to comply with an Order of the Court. Any party may ser ve and file written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. No reply to any response shall be filed. If objections are not timely filed, then the parties' rights to de novo review by the District Court may be deemed waived. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 7/9/20.(BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
