Young v. Ryan et al
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| Ronald Kelly Young |
| 4:2018cv00036 |
| January 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Bernardo P Velasco (PS) |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 107 ) is ADOPTED; Young's Amended Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 93) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter, and; A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue in this case. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/28/24. (MYE)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 43 Motion for Leave to File Supplement Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Petitioner's supplemental memorandum (lodged at Doc. 45). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 14 days of the dat e of this Order, Respondents shall file an answer to Petitioner's new claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days of service of the answer. The answer and reply shall not exceed five pages in length or address any other issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria S Davila on 9/16/2019. (DLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
