Beitch v. Magnus et al
| Aaron Harvey Beitch |
| Chris Magnus, Justin Lane, Mickey Peterson, Dennis J Miller, Paulina Reed, Chelsea Lynn Gutierrez, Robert Jude Miranda, David W Hill, Colin Jefferson Hyde, Daniel Rodriguez, Brendan Wiberg and Cynthia Kozda |
| 4:2018cv00067 |
| February 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Bernardo P Velasco |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
*ORDER Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to Allow Non-Electronic Filing of Exhibit #2 (Doc. 66 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED AS MOOT in part. The City Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff Aaron Beitch [sic] Response to Defendants Op position to Strike Plaintiff Motion of Facts in Support of Plaintiff [sic] Opposition to Summary of Judgment Doc. 71 (Doc. 72 ) is DENIED. The City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 50 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 6/1/2020. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC) *Modified file date from 5/29/2020 to 6/1/2020; NEF regenerated on 6/2/2020 (SCH).
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying 46 Motion to Defendants Answers to Production, Admission, and Interrogatories Request and Joint Settlement Conference; denying 54 Motion to Produce. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 4/3/2019. (See attached Order for complete information) (DLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
