Green v. Ryan et al
| Alfred Green |
| Charles L Ryan, Arizona Department of Corrections, Corizon Health Services, Unknown Sherfield and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2018cv00068 |
| February 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
ORDER denying 196 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 2/11/22. (See attached Order for complete details) (JAM)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion to the Clerk Request an Extension of Filine [sic] Notice of Appeal" (Doc. 190 ) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Special Action Motion Request for Counsel, Request for Interpreter, Request for Investigator" (Doc. 189 ) and "Interrourtorres [sic]Spection [sic]Civil RemediesState vs. MadisonMarshall vs. Stewartfor Full Discovery" (Doc. 191 ) are denied. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 10/4/2021. (MCO)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 172 ), Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 173 ), Motion Requesting Leave of Court to Reopen Discovery to New Evidence (Doc. 174 ), Motion Requesting Leave of Court Ordering Centurion to Compel (Doc. 175 ), and Motion to Compel (Doc. 183 ) are denied. (See attached Order for complete details) Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 9/3/2021. (MCO)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Request Leave of Court (Doc. 92 ) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 93 ) are denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 7/10/2020. (MFR)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. [83)] is granted. Defendant's Lodged Proposed Reply to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 84) shall be filed as Defendant's Reply to the Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall re-docket Plaintiffs "Request for Default Against Defendants" (Doc. 85) as a Response to the Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/24/2020. (MCO)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motions for Subpoenas (Docs. 64 , 65 ) are denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Initial Discovery Waiver (Doc. 66 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 68 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiff's Motions to Supplement Pleading (Docs. 67 , 69 ) are denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Interrogatories (Doc. 72 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/8/2019. (ARC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
