Reed v. Universal Health Services

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Reed v. Universal Health Services

Reed v. Universal Health Services

Plaintiff:	Benjamin C Reed
Defendant:	Universal Health Services
Case Number:	4:2018cv00101
Filed:	February 26, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2019	Filing 26 ORDERED: Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Defendant is denied. Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Recover Unnecessary Costs of Service and Begin Default Proceedings is denied. Defendant Universal Health Services 13 , 20 Motions to Dismiss are granted in part. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint within (30) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 2/12/2019. (BAR)
June 20, 2018	Filing 9 ORDER denying 8 Application to Proceed IFP. Reed must pay the filing fee associated with this matter on or before sixty (60) days from the date of this order. If Reed fails to tender payment as ordered, the Clerk of the Court is ordered to immediately enter judgment dismissing this matter, without prejudice, and to close its file in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 6/20/2018. (see Order for complete details) (SIB)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 12, 2019

Filing 26 ORDERED: Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Defendant is denied. Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Recover Unnecessary Costs of Service and Begin Default Proceedings is denied. Defendant Universal Health Services 13 , 20 Motions to Dismiss are granted in part. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint within (30) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 2/12/2019. (BAR)

June 20, 2018

Filing 9 ORDER denying 8 Application to Proceed IFP. Reed must pay the filing fee associated with this matter on or before sixty (60) days from the date of this order. If Reed fails to tender payment as ordered, the Clerk of the Court is ordered to immediately enter judgment dismissing this matter, without prejudice, and to close its file in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 6/20/2018. (see Order for complete details) (SIB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. Universal Health Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin C Reed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Universal Health Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?