Tolano et al v. El Rio Bakery et al
| Maria Tolano, Francisco Javier Ponce Bernal, Jose Daniel Mendoza and Raquel Herrera |
| El Rio Bakery and Carlos Guillermo Vargas Mendoza |
| 4:2018cv00125 |
| March 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 29 , 30 Motion to Court for Entry of Default Judgment and Request for Monetary Relief as to Defendants El Rio Bakery and Carlos Guillermo Vargas Mendoza. It is further ordered that Defendants shall be liable to Pla intiffs for damages as set forth below: Total for Plaintiff Tolano: $52,171; Total for Plaintiff Bernal: $51,925; Total for Plaintiff Mendoza: $30,106; Total for Plaintiff Herrera: $62,876. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/27/2019. (BAR)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date this Order is docketed, Plaintiffs may submit evidence as to the damages they experienced as a result of their termination. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date this Order is docketed, Defendants must show cause as to why default judgment should not be entered against them. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/20/2019. (KEP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
