Spears v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
||Roy E Spears
||Arizona Board of Regents, Brian Seastone, Greg Ewer, Ian Theel and Kathryn Adams Riester
||March 8, 2018
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Tucson Division Office
||Cindy K Jorgenson
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 7, 2019
ORDER the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27 ) is GRANTED. The claims for a violation of free speech (Count I), a violation of due process (Count II), a violation of equal protection (Count III), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count IV), ab use of process (Count V), false light invasion of privacy (Count VI), arrest without probable cause (Count VII), and false arrest/false imprisonment (Count VIII) are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. State law claims against individual Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND for failure to comply with the Notice of Claim statute. Claims for non-prospective injunctive relief against the Arizona Board of Regents and Seastone in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Claims against individual defendants in their official capacities for damages are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons discussed herein. Spears has 30 days from the date of this Order is filed t o file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Spears fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 35 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/6/2019. (See attached Order for complete information)(DLC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?