Spears v. Arizona Board of Regents et al

Plaintiff: Roy E Spears
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents, Brian Seastone, Greg Ewer, Ian Theel and Kathryn Adams Riester
Case Number: 4:2018cv00126
Filed: March 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27 ) is GRANTED. The claims for a violation of free speech (Count I), a violation of due process (Count II), a violation of equal protection (Count III), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count IV), ab use of process (Count V), false light invasion of privacy (Count VI), arrest without probable cause (Count VII), and false arrest/false imprisonment (Count VIII) are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. State law claims against individual Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND for failure to comply with the Notice of Claim statute. Claims for non-prospective injunctive relief against the Arizona Board of Regents and Seastone in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Claims against individual defendants in their official capacities for damages are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons discussed herein. Spears has 30 days from the date of this Order is filed t o file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Spears fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 35 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/6/2019. (See attached Order for complete information)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spears v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy E Spears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Seastone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Ewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ian Theel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathryn Adams Riester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?