Sorro v. Arizona, State of

Sorro v. Arizona, State of

Petitioner:	Marvin Arido Sorro
Respondent:	Arizona, State of
Case Number:	4:2018cv00219
Filed:	April 24, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline M Rateau (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2020	Filing 55 ORDER denying 54 Motion for Leave to Appeal. This case remains CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 6/30/2020. (MCO)
January 8, 2020	Filing 49 ORDERED that the Motion for Leave of Court to Expand the Record 32 is DENIED. Motion to Disclose Obstruction of Justice 33 , Motion to Vacate sentence (Docs. 34 and 35); Motion: Re-Disclosed the First was Missing 06/20/2015; Motion: Present Fabri cation Arrest Report by Detective Ives; Motion: To Vacate with a Memorandum of Understanding 36 , Motion for Federal Question Jurisdiction ProsecutionPerjury 38 ; Motion for Federal QuestionObstruction of Justice or Conspiracy 39 ; Motion for Fede ral Question Jurisdiction-Privacy 40 ; Motion:Brady Violation; Motion: Request Rule 4A Search and Seizure; Motion: Vacate Sentence 41 ; Motion for Federal Question Fraudulent Concealment (Brady Violation) 42 ; Motion for Federal Question Right to Remain Silent 5th and 14th 43 ; Motion to Support of Habeas Corpus Relief, and; Motion Vacate Conviction in Release 44 are DENIED. Pursuant to the Request for Clarification Status 45 the Court accepts the submission of the documents in support o f Arido-Sorro's habeas petition. The Motion for Judicial NoticeComplete and Total Denial of Natural Justice 47 and Motion for Objections Recommendation for Magistrate Judge 48 , accepted as Arido-Sorro's Objection to the R & R, are OVERR ULED. The Report and Recommendation 46 is ADOPTED; Arido-Sorro's Amended Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody 10 is DENIED; The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter, and a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue in this case. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 01/07/20. (MYE)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2020

Filing 55 ORDER denying 54 Motion for Leave to Appeal. This case remains CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 6/30/2020. (MCO)

January 8, 2020

Filing 49 ORDERED that the Motion for Leave of Court to Expand the Record 32 is DENIED. Motion to Disclose Obstruction of Justice 33 , Motion to Vacate sentence (Docs. 34 and 35); Motion: Re-Disclosed the First was Missing 06/20/2015; Motion: Present Fabri cation Arrest Report by Detective Ives; Motion: To Vacate with a Memorandum of Understanding 36 , Motion for Federal Question Jurisdiction ProsecutionPerjury 38 ; Motion for Federal QuestionObstruction of Justice or Conspiracy 39 ; Motion for Fede ral Question Jurisdiction-Privacy 40 ; Motion:Brady Violation; Motion: Request Rule 4A Search and Seizure; Motion: Vacate Sentence 41 ; Motion for Federal Question Fraudulent Concealment (Brady Violation) 42 ; Motion for Federal Question Right to Remain Silent 5th and 14th 43 ; Motion to Support of Habeas Corpus Relief, and; Motion Vacate Conviction in Release 44 are DENIED. Pursuant to the Request for Clarification Status 45 the Court accepts the submission of the documents in support o f Arido-Sorro's habeas petition. The Motion for Judicial NoticeComplete and Total Denial of Natural Justice 47 and Motion for Objections Recommendation for Magistrate Judge 48 , accepted as Arido-Sorro's Objection to the R & R, are OVERR ULED. The Report and Recommendation 46 is ADOPTED; Arido-Sorro's Amended Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody 10 is DENIED; The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter, and a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue in this case. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 01/07/20. (MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sorro v. Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Marvin Arido Sorro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?