Beaulieu v. Dannels et al

Beaulieu v. Dannels et al

Case Number:	4:2018cv00332
Filed:	March 18, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 5, 2019	Filing 15 ORDERED: The 13 Report and Recommendation is adopted. Plaintiff's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall docket accordingly and close the case filein this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 4/4/2019. (BAR)
March 18, 2019	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, enter an order Dismissing the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Beaulieu's claims are not exhausted. Any party may serve and file written obje ctions within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. Local Rules permit a response to an objection, they do not permit a reply to a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 3/18/19. (BAC)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 5, 2019

Filing 15 ORDERED: The 13 Report and Recommendation is adopted. Plaintiff's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall docket accordingly and close the case filein this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 4/4/2019. (BAR)

March 18, 2019

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, enter an order Dismissing the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Beaulieu's claims are not exhausted. Any party may serve and file written obje ctions within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. Local Rules permit a response to an objection, they do not permit a reply to a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 3/18/19. (BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beaulieu v. Dannels et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?