Long v. United States of America et al
| Gary Lee Long, Jr. |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Mistifer, United States of America and Unknown Hayden |
| 4:2018cv00381 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gary Lee Long, Jr. (BAR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (BAC) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Gary Lee Long, Jr. (6 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BAC) |
Filing 1
IT IS ORDERED this matter is severed into individual actions, one for each Plaintiff. Clerk of Court must assign a new case number to each newly created individual action. Clerk must file a copy of the #1 Complaint and this Order in each new case. Each individual Plaintiff must proceed independently from this point forward and will not be regarded as a co-plaintiff. All further pleadings, motions, or other papers submitted by an individual Plaintiff must be filed in that individual's case, and signed by that individual Plaintiff personally, or they will be stricken. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/6/18.(BAC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
