Martin v. Ross Dress for Less Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Catherine Martin
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Ross Dress for Less Incorporated and Ross Dress for Less Incorporated a Virginia corporation doing business as Ross Dress for Less
Case Number: 4:2018cv00389
Filed: August 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Party Dismissal by Catherine Martin. Party Unknown Parties (named as ABC Corporations 1-5, XYZ Partnerships 1-5) terminated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Bayham, Thomas)
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: that Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Defendants ABCCorporations 1-5 and XYZ Partnerships 1-5 should not be dismissed with permission for leave to add parties in the future. If Plaintiff does not respond to this Order within ten (10) days, Defendants ABC Corporations 1-5 and XYZ Partnerships 1-5 will be dismissed from this case without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/26/2018. (MCO)
September 24, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Ross Dress for Less Incorporated. (Anderson, Matthew)
September 5, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Catherine Martin. (Bayham, Thomas)
August 30, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Catherine Martin. (Bayham, Thomas)
August 16, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Ross Dress for Less Incorporated.(Anderson, Matthew)
August 9, 2018 Filing 6 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Ross Dress for Less Incorporated. (Anderson, Matthew)
August 9, 2018 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ross Dress for Less Incorporated. (Anderson, Matthew)
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KAH)
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Ross Dress for Less Incorporated. (KAH)
August 7, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15815297. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Cindy K Jorgenson. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-00389-TUC-CKJ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KAH)
August 7, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20183161. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15815297 filed by Ross Dress for Less Incorporated. (Anderson, Matthew) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit) (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Ross Dress for Less Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Martin
Represented By: Thomas Michael Bayham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
Represented By: Matthew Thomas Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ross Dress for Less Incorporated a Virginia corporation doing business as Ross Dress for Less
Represented By: Matthew Thomas Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?