Mendoza v. Yocupicio et al
Plaintiff: Jeannie Mendoza
Defendant: Nansi Naranjo, Roman Yocupicio and Mary Stiernar
Case Number: 4:2018cv00399
Filed: August 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Santa Cruz
Presiding Judge: Lynnette C Kimmins
Referring Judge: Rosemary Marquez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE re: re Proof of Notice by Nansi Naranjo, Mary Stiernar, Roman Yocupicio . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Sanders, Jennifer)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDERED that within 15 days of this Order, Defendants shall file with theCourt a Proof of Notice to Plaintiff showing their compliance with the notice requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1446(d). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 10/3/2018. (See ORDER for details)(MCO)
September 10, 2018 Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jeannie Mendoza. Reason for return: Return to Sender-Vacant-Unable to Forward. Document number 12. (MCO)
September 10, 2018 Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jeannie Mendoza. Reason for return: Return to Sender Unclaimed Unable to Forward. Document number 10. (MCO)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that Plaintiff shall have seven (7) days to file a Notice of Address change as required by LRCiv 83.3(d). Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with Court orders could result in a dismissal of this action. (See attached Order for details) Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/30/2018. (MCO)
August 23, 2018 Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jeannie Mendoza. Reason for return: Return to Sender Refused Unable to Forward. Document number 6 and 7 (MCO)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, that Plaintiff shall have until 9/24/2018 to file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file any reply within fifteen (15) days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/21/2018. (MCO)
August 20, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Nansi Naranjo, Mary Stiernar, Roman Yocupicio. (Sanders, Jennifer)
August 20, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE re: Local Rule 12.1(c) Certification by Nansi Naranjo, Mary Stiernar, Roman Yocupicio . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sanders, Jennifer)
August 15, 2018 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED Case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge, Rosemary Marquez. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-18-00399-TUC-RM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.(BAC)
August 15, 2018 Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC)
August 14, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MFR)
August 14, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR)
August 13, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15838042. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Lynnette C Kimmins. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-00399-TUC-LCK. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (MFR)
August 13, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Cruz County Superior Court, case number S1200CV201800185. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15838042 filed by Mary Stiernar, Nansi Naranjo, Roman Yocupicio. (Sanders, Jennifer) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Demand for Trial by Jury)(MFR)
August 13, 2018 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons and Complaint, First Amended Complaint for Signature and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Ramon Yocupicio on 7/23/2018 (original filed in Santa Cruz County Superior Court on 8/1/2018). (MFR) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendoza v. Yocupicio et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nansi Naranjo
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Represented By: Jennifer June Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roman Yocupicio
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Represented By: Jennifer June Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Stiernar
Represented By: Claudia Acosta Collings
Represented By: Jennifer June Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeannie Mendoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?