Pfeiff v. Ryan et al
Petitioner: Richard Kenneth Pfeiff
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Case Number: 4:2018cv00450
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau (PS)
Referring Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau
2 Judge: James A Soto
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Filing 13 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #12 Additional Attachments to Main Document, #11 Additional Attachments to Main Document, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254), #10 Response to Habeas Petition (State/2254) Index of Exhibits U-BB by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U, #2 Exhibit V, #3 Exhibit W, #4 Exhibit X, #5 Exhibit Y, #6 Exhibit Z, #7 Exhibit AA, #8 Exhibit BB)(Damstra, Kathryn)
October 26, 2018 Filing 12 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #11 Additional Attachments to Main Document, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254), #10 Response to Habeas Petition (State/2254) Index of Exhibits K-T by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit K, #2 Exhibit L, #3 Exhibit M, #4 Exhibit N, #5 Exhibit O, #6 Exhibit P, #7 Exhibit Q, #8 Exhibit R, #9 Exhibit S, #10 Exhibit T)(Damstra, Kathryn)
October 26, 2018 Filing 11 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254), #10 Response to Habeas Petition (State/2254) Index of Exhibits A-J by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Damstra, Kathryn)
October 26, 2018 Filing 10 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan.(Damstra, Kathryn)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Waive Formal Filing Requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 10/2/2018. (BAR)
September 28, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Ann Damstra on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan. (Damstra, Kathryn)
September 27, 2018 Filing 8 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP)
September 27, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to Waive Formal Filing Requirements by Richard Kenneth Pfeiff. (2 pages) (BAR)
September 24, 2018 Filing 5 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 09/19/18. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Sparks, Jeffrey)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254), granting the #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Kenneth Pfeiff. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney Generals Office.Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service.Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/17/2018. (BAR)
September 10, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (KAH)
September 10, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Kenneth Pfeiff. (2 pages) (KAH)
September 10, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Richard Kenneth Pfeiff. (11 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pfeiff v. Ryan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Kathryn Ann Damstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Represented By: Kathryn Ann Damstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Kenneth Pfeiff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?