Tamez v. Din et al
| Mario Tamez |
| Cochise County Jail, First Baptist Church, Moeen Din, Cochise County Sheriff's Department, Randy Garcia, Open MRI Solutions, Benson Police Department and Ann Roberts |
| 4:2018cv00468 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jacqueline M Rateau |
| Personal Injury: Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 the above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All remaining pending motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court shall close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 10/17/2018. (MCO)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss/Withdraw from the Case by Mario Tamez. (1 page) (SIB) |
|
Filing 9
ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 10/1/2018. (MCO)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Mario Tamez. (1 page) (KEP) |
| Filing 11 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Mario Tamez. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (MCO) |
|
Filing 6
Ordered that Plaintiffs leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted however, for the reasons explained in Order, the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 10/1/2018. (See ORDER for complete details) (MCO)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jacqueline M. Rateau. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-468-TUC-JR. Magistrate Election form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mario Tamez. (KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mario Tamez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
