Tartt v. Roberts et al
| Gerald Tartt |
| D. W. Monson, Unknown Towle, Julie Roberts, Meegan Muse and DW Monson |
| 4:2018cv00510 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Courts order filed October 17, 2018, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (BAR) |
Filing 12
ORDERED: The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of Tartt v. Roberts, et al., Case. No. CV-18-00475-TUC-RCC (D. Ariz.) and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Plaintiff's #8 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Order and because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 10/17/2018. (BAR)
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: Northern District of California transferred complaint to the Arizona District Court. (BAR) |
| Filing 10 (AMENDED BY DOC #11 )-NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (BAR) Modified on 10/15/2018 (BAR). |
| Filing 9 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Northern; Case Number 5:18-cv-05780 . Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF TRANSFER to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/9/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gerald Tartt. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gerald Tartt. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Clerk's Notice re: IFP (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 10/29/2018. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gerald Tartt. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D. W. Monson, Meegan Muse, Julie Roberts, Towle. Filed by Gerald Tartt. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) [Transferred from cand on 10/12/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
