Genomics USA Incorporated v. PathogenDx Incorporated et al
Genomics USA Incorporated |
Unknown LaChance, Unknown Patel, Michael Hogan, Eric LaChance, Milan Patel, PathogenDx Incorporated, Unknown Parties and Unknown Hogan |
4:2018cv00521 |
October 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James A Soto |
Contract: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: After all parties have been served and have answered the complaint, Plaintiff(s) shall file a motion indicating that all Defendants have filed answers such that the case is ready to proceed to the next step in litigation. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants at the same time they serve the Summons and Complaint; if these have already been served on Defendants prior to Plaintiffs receiving this Order, Plaintiffs shall serve this Order on Defendants within 14 days of the filing date of this Order. (see Order for complete details) Signed by Judge James A Soto on 10/24/2018. (SIB) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Genomics USA Incorporated. (Laird, Brian) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Genomics USA Incorporated. (SIB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Michael Hogan, Unknown Hogan, Eric LaChance, Unknown LaChance, Milan Patel, Unknown Patel, PathogenDx Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(SIB). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16103028. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Soto. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-521-TUC-JAS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Genomics USA Incorporated. (Laird, Brian) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(SIB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16103028 filed by Genomics USA Incorporated. (Laird, Brian) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.