Novoa v. Grijalva et al
| Alice Novoa |
| Michele Regan and Raul Grijalva |
| 4:2018cv00540 |
| November 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Courts Order filed December 11, 2018, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed with prejudice. (BAR) |
Filing 13
ORDERED that the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the #12 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied as moot. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 12/11/2018. (BAR)
|
| Filing 12 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alice Novoa. (BAR) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Raul Grijalva, Michele Regan filed by Alice Novoa. (9 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BAR) |
| Filing 10 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
|
Filing 8
ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action without further notice if Plaintiff fails to comply with this deadline. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and #6 Motion for Reduction of Time to Respond are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 11/15/2018. (BAR)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MCO) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Reduction in Time to Respond (Pursuant to ARCIVP Rule 34(B)) by Alice Novoa. (MCO) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Production of Documents (Pursuant to ARCIVP Rule 34) by Plaintiff Alice Novoa. (MCO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable D Thomas Ferraro. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-00540-TUC-DTF. Magistrate Election form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alice Novoa. (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alice Novoa.(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
