Floyd v. Nielsen
Plaintiff: Thomas Floyd
Defendant: Kirstjen M Nielsen
Case Number: 4:2019cv00034
Filed: January 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 633
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE re: Notice of Service of Documents by Thomas Floyd re: #4 Notice re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP), #3 New Case Opened . (Frazier, Roger)
March 14, 2019 Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Thomas Floyd: Declaration of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary US Department of Homeland Security on February 19, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Return Receipts, #2 Exhibit USPS Tracking)(Frazier, Roger)
February 27, 2019 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Thomas Floyd: Declaration of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Acting Attorney General of the United States Matthew G. Whittaker on February 21, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Frazier, Roger)
February 20, 2019 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Thomas Floyd: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons and complaint upon Assistant U.S. Attorney on February 15, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipt Request Form)(Frazier, Roger)
January 23, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kirstjen M Nielsen. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
January 23, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ARC)
January 22, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16438644. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Frank R Zapata. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-34-TUC-FRZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
January 22, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Thomas Floyd. (Frazier, Roger) (ARC)
January 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16438644 filed by Thomas Floyd. (Frazier, Roger) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Floyd v. Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen M Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Floyd
Represented By: Roger Wayne Frazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?