Southwest Fair Housing Council v. WG Chandler Villas SH LLC
Southwest Fair Housing Council |
WG Chandler Villas SH LLC and WG Chandler Villas SH LLC doing business as Atria Chandler Villas |
4:2019cv00178 |
March 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Rosemary Marquez |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/2/2019. Dispositive motions due by 1/15/2020. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due within 30 days after resolution of an dispositive motions filed. If no such motions are filed, a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order will be due on or before 1/24/2020. Joint Settlement Status Report due by 9/12/2019 and every 60 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 6/5/2019. (SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS.)(BAR) |
Filing 14 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Silverman, Peter) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Richards, William) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Richards, William) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by William August Richards. (Richards, William) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a telephonic Pretrial Scheduling Conference is set for June 4, 2019, at 11:30 a.m., before Esther Sanchez-Gomez, law clerk to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. The parties are directed to confer at least 21 days before the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file with the Court, on or before May 31, 2019, a Joint Report reflecting the results of their meeting and outlining their discovery plan. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/11/2019. (See ORDER for details) (MCO) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant WG Chandler Villas SH LLC. (Oller, Robert) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WG Chandler Villas SH LLC identifying Corporate Parent Ventas, Inc. for WG Chandler Villas SH LLC. (Oller, Robert) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint by WG Chandler Villas SH LLC.(Oller, Robert) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Ryan Grant Lockner. (Lockner, Ryan) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #2 ) no later than April 17, 2019. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/5/2019. (MCO) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 19-00178-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against WG Chandler Villas SH LLC filed by Southwest Fair Housing Council.(BAR) |
Filing 1 ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Sever 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 98, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 are granted. It is further ordered that this matter is severed into individual actions, one for each of the following Defendants: WG Chandler Villas SH, LLC d/b/a Atria Chandler Villas, WG Campana Del Rio SH, LLC d/b/a/ Atria Campana Del Rio, WG Scottsdale, LLC d/b/a Atria Sierra Pointe, Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. d/b/a/ Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch and Brookdale Freedom Plaza, Immanuel Caring Ministries, Inc and CopperSands, Inc. d/b/a Immanuel Campus of Care, La Posada at Park Centre, Inc., MorningStar Senior Management, LLC and MS Arrowhead, LLC d/b/a MorningStar at Arrowhead, Solterra of Arizona, LLC, The Ensign Group, Inc. and Saguaro Senior Living, Inc. d/b/a Sherwood Village Assisted Living and Memory Care, SRG Management, LLC d/b/a Silver Springs and Village at Ocotillo, Sunrise Senior Living Development, Inc., Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc., and Sunrise Senior Living Service, Inc., d/b/a Sunrise at River Road, Watermark Retirement Communities, Inc. d/b/a Fountains at La Cholla. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number to each newly created individual action and, pursuant to LRCiv. 42.1, shall assign each newly created individual action to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. The Clerk of Court shall file a copy of the First Amended Complaint and this Order in each newly created individual actions. It is further ordered that the Maricopa County Defendants Motions to Transfer (Doc. 100, 102, 104) are denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 3/26/2019. (BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.