Southwest Fair Housing Council v. La Posada at Park Centre Incorporated
| Southwest Fair Housing Council |
| La Posada at Park Centre Incorporated |
| 4:2019cv00183 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Stuart, Shayna) |
Filing 14
ORDER: Discovery due 11/18/2019; Dispositive motions due 12/16/2020; Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due 1/20/2020. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 6/13/19.(BAC)
|
| Filing 13 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Stuart, Shayna) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant La Posada at Park Centre Incorporated. (Winkelman, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Stuart, Shayna) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 5/30/2019 at 10:00 AM before the law clerk to the Honorable Judge Rosemary Marquez. The parties are directed to confer at least 21 days before the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), to discuss the following matters. It is further ordered that counsel shall file with the Court, on or before May 23, 2019, a Joint Report reflecting the results of their meeting and outlining their discovery plan. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/17/2019. (SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS.)(BAR)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by La Posada at Park Centre Incorporated. (Winkelman, David) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint by La Posada at Park Centre Incorporated.(Winkelman, David) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Richards, William) |
| Filing 6 *NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by William August Richards. (Richards, William) *Modified to add attorney Shayna G Suart; modified to remove attorney David E Wood on 4/11/2019 (MFR). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #2 First Amended Complaint no later than 4/17/19. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/5/19. (BAC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-183-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against La Posada at Park Centre Incorporated filed by Southwest Fair Housing Council.(ARC) |
|
Filing 1
ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Sever 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 98, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 are granted. It is further ordered that this matter is severed into individual actions, one for each of the following Defendants: WG Chandler Villas SH, LLC d/b/a Atria Chandler Villas, WG Campana Del Rio SH, LLC d/b/a/ Atria Campana Del Rio, WG Scottsdale, LLC d/b/a Atria Sierra Pointe, Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. d/b/a/ Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch and Brookdale Freedom Plaza, Immanuel Caring Ministries, Inc and CopperSands, Inc. d/b/a Immanuel Campus of Care, La Posada at Park Centre, Inc., MorningStar Senior Management, LLC and MS Arrowhead, LLC d/b/a MorningStar at Arrowhead, Solterra of Arizona, LLC, The Ensign Group, Inc. and Saguaro Senior Living, Inc. d/b/a Sherwood Village Assisted Living and Memory Care, SRG Management, LLC d/b/a Silver Springs and Village at Ocotillo, Sunrise Senior Living Development, Inc., Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc., and Sunrise Senior Living Service, Inc., d/b/a Sunrise at River Road, Watermark Retirement Communities, Inc. d/b/a Fountains at La Cholla. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number to each newly created individual action and, pursuant to LRCiv. 42.1, shall assign each newly created individual action to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. The Clerk of Court shall file a copy of the First Amended Complaint and this Order in each newly created individual actions. It is further ordered that the Maricopa County Defendants Motions to Transfer (Doc. 100, 102, 104) are denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 3/26/2019. (ARC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
