Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated et al
Southwest Fair Housing Council |
Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated doing business as Sunrise at River Road, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated doing business as Sunrise at River Road and Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated doing business as Sunrise at River Road |
4:2019cv00188 |
March 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Rosemary Marquez |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER: the Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss Certain Claims and Defendants With Prejudice #15 is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Sunrise Development, Inc. (named in the First Amended Complaint as Sunrise Senior Living Development, Inc.) and Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc. (named in the First Amended Complaint as Sunrise Senior Living Service, Inc.) are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims under the Rehabilitation Act (Count II of the FAC, 92-104) and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (Count IV of the FAC, 117-127) are dismissed with prejudice. (MCO) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses (MIDP) filed by Defendants Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated. (Gaona, David) |
Filing 16 ORDER pursuant to #14 Stipulation : IT IS ORDERED that the Parties' Stipulation to Strike Paragraph 77 of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. #14 ) is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Paragraph 77 of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. #2 ) is stricken. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 6/20/2019. (MCO) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE by Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gaona, David) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION TO STRIKE PARAGRAPH 77 OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gaona, David) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Miller, Austin) |
Filing 12 ORDER pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: All discovery shall be completed by all parties no later than October 4, 2019. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before November 22, 2019. Counsel shall file a brief Joint Settlement Status Report on or before September 6, 2019, and every 60 days thereafter. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order will be due on or before December 20, 2019. The parties must exchange drafts of the Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order at least fourteen (14) days before the submission deadline. The parties and their counsel are cautioned that the deadlines set in this Scheduling Order shall be strictly enforced and may be modified only for good cause and with leave of Court. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 5/23/2019. [Review ORDER for details.] (MCO) |
Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Miller, Austin) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Richards, William) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Southwest Fair Housing Council. (Richards, William) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by William August Richards. (Richards, William) |
Filing 7 ORDER Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a telephonic Pretrial Scheduling Conference is set for May 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., before Esther Sanchez-Gomez, law clerk to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. The parties are directed to confer at least 21 days before the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file with the Court, on or before May 17, 2019, a Joint Report reflecting the results of their meeting. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/5/2019. (See ORDER for details) (MCO) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendants Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated. (Gaona, David) |
Filing 5 Amended ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint by Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated.(Gaona, David) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: 4:19-cv-00188-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated, Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated filed by Southwest Fair Housing Council.(BAR) |
Filing 1 ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Sever 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 98, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 are granted. It is further ordered that this matter is severed into individual actions, one for each of the following Defendants: WG Chandler Villas SH, LLC d/b/a Atria Chandler Villas, WG Campana Del Rio SH, LLC d/b/a/ Atria Campana Del Rio, WG Scottsdale, LLC d/b/a Atria Sierra Pointe, Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. d/b/a/ Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch and Brookdale Freedom Plaza, Immanuel Caring Ministries, Inc and CopperSands, Inc. d/b/a Immanuel Campus of Care, La Posada at Park Centre, Inc., MorningStar Senior Management, LLC and MS Arrowhead, LLC d/b/a MorningStar at Arrowhead, Solterra of Arizona, LLC, The Ensign Group, Inc. and Saguaro Senior Living, Inc. d/b/a Sherwood Village Assisted Living and Memory Care, SRG Management, LLC d/b/a Silver Springs and Village at Ocotillo, Sunrise Senior Living Development, Inc., Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc., and Sunrise Senior Living Service, Inc., d/b/a Sunrise at River Road, Watermark Retirement Communities, Inc. d/b/a Fountains at La Cholla. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number to each newly created individual action and, pursuant to LRCiv. 42.1, shall assign each newly created individual action to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. The Clerk of Court shall file a copy of the First Amended Complaint and this Order in each newly created individual actions. It is further ordered that the Maricopa County Defendants Motions to Transfer (Doc. 100, 102, 104) are denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 3/26/2019. (BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Gaona |
Represented By: | Roopali H Desai |
Represented By: | Kent S Brockelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Gaona |
Represented By: | Roopali H Desai |
Represented By: | Kent S Brockelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Gaona |
Represented By: | Roopali H Desai |
Represented By: | Kent S Brockelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Management Incorporated doing business as Sunrise at River Road | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Gaona |
Represented By: | Roopali H Desai |
Represented By: | Kent S Brockelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Service Incorporated doing business as Sunrise at River Road | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Gaona |
Represented By: | Roopali H Desai |
Represented By: | Kent S Brockelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Development Incorporated doing business as Sunrise at River Road | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Gaona |
Represented By: | Roopali H Desai |
Represented By: | Kent S Brockelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Southwest Fair Housing Council | |
Represented By: | David Eric Wood |
Represented By: | William August Richards |
Represented By: | Andrew Rozynski |
Represented By: | Eric Mark Baum |
Represented By: | Alan Scott Baskin |
Represented By: | Austin Jeffrey Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.