Cecena #250603 v. Unknown Parties et al
Plaintiff: Pablo Oseas Cecena
Defendant: Unknown Tucker, Unknown Parties, Unknown Roach and Unknown Moreno
Case Number: 4:2019cv00252
Filed: May 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: James A Soto
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee, or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified 6-month trust account statement. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff and denial of any pending unrelated motions as moot. Clerk must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas).Motions terminated: #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Pablo Oseas Cecena. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 5/13/19.(BAC)
May 3, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE : FRCiv.5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (MCO)
May 3, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE : This case is subject to General Order 14-17, which supersedes General Order 14-14. Please see attached Order and Notice. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(MCO)
May 3, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO)
May 3, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Pablo Oseas Cecena. (9 pages) (MCO)
May 3, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Pablo Oseas Cecena. (2 pages) (MCO)
May 3, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Pablo Oseas Cecena. (22 pages)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cecena #250603 v. Unknown Parties et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pablo Oseas Cecena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Roach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?